Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science
  • New Submission
  • Register
  • Login
  • English
    • فارسی

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery

  • Home
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Editorial Board
    • Author Guideline
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Issues
    • Archives
    • Current
    • Accepted Manuscript
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • Ethics
    • Ethical requirements
    • Publication Ethics and Research Misconduct
    • Ethical Considerations for Human Subjects
  • Declaration of AI Use
  • New Submission
Advanced Search
  1. Home
  2. Archives
  3. Vol. 17 No. 60 (2008): Fall 2008
  4. Research Article-Nursing

Vol. 17 No. 60 (2008)

October 2008

Comparing two antiseptic solutions for scrubbing

  • M Yuldashkhan
  • F Bolurchifard
  • Z Amiri

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, Vol. 17 No. 60 (2008), 24 October 2008 , Page 15-21
https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v17i60.644

  • View Article
  • Download
  • Cite
  • Statastics
  • Share

Abstract

Introduction

Scrubbing of surgical team is an important precaution for postoperative infections. It is performed to disinfect the hands, leading to secondary infection reduction of surgical wound. The procedure is done mechanically and chemically with scrub solutions such as povidone iodine, alcoholic disinfectants, chlorhexidine etc. In Iran, the routine solution of scrubbing is povidone iodine (Betadine). The Purpose of this clinical trial was to compare the disinfectant effects of Betadine with Decosept on the hands of surgical team in Loghman-e-Hakim teaching hospital affiliated to Shaheed Beheshti Medical University.

 

Materials and Methods

30 operating room (OR) staff and students were selected by convenient sampling method. Each subject scrubbed 2 times with 1-week interval, first with Betadine and second with Decosept. All members of a surgical team in an operation scrubbed with a similar method and solution. Samples were collected from the hands before and after scrubbing for the first scheduled operation through instructing the procedure (hand washing with soap and water, rinsing, complete drying, application 15 ml of one of the solutions in three stages [at each stage, 5 ml and 1-minute interval], rinsing and complete drying), placing the hands in culture media and sending the samples to laboratory in standard condition for recording.

 

Results

Findings showed significant differences in the colonies of Gram-positive cocci, Gram-negative bacilli and fungi before and after scrubbing in each solution (P=0.0001). No positive case was found before and after the procedure with respect to Gram-negative cocci and Gram-positive bacilli. No significant difference was found between the effects of the 2 solutions before and after scrubbing.

 

Conclusion

Both solutions were effective on disinfecting the hands of surgical team.

 

Keywords:  Povidene (Betadine), Decosept, Scrubbing, Disinfection.

  • PDF

How to Cite

Yuldashkhan, M., Bolurchifard, F., & Amiri, Z. (2008). Comparing two antiseptic solutions for scrubbing. Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, 17(60), 15–21. https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v17i60.644
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX
  • Abstract Viewed: 571 times
  • PDF Downloaded: 282 times

Download Statastics

  • Linkedin
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Google Plus
  • Telegram

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Language

  • English
  • فارسی
  • Home
  • Archives
  • Submissions
  • About the Journal
  • Editorial Team
  • Contact

Print ISSN: 2383-3750
Electronic ISSN: 2538-399X

Powered by OJSPlus