Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Science
  • New Submission
  • ثبت‌نام
  • ورود
  • فارسی
    • English

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery

  • Home
  • اطلاعیه‌ها
  • درباره
    • درباره‌ی مجله
    • Editorial Board
    • Author Guideline
    • بیانه حریم خصوصی
    • اطلاعات تماس
  • Issues
    • بایگانی‌ها
    • شماره جاری
    • Accepted Manuscript
  • Indexing/Abstracting
  • Ethics
    • Ethical requirements
    • Publication Ethics and Research Misconduct
    • Ethical Considerations for Human Subjects
  • Declaration of AI Use
  • New Submission
جستجوی پیشرفته
  1. صفحه اصلی
  2. بایگانی‌ها
  3. دوره 17 شماره 56 (2007): Fall 2007
  4. Research Article-Nursing

دوره 17 شماره 56 (2007)

مهر 2007

Sampling in quantitative research

  • M Khatiban
  • J Abed Saeed
  • I Ashtari

Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, دوره 17 شماره 56 (2007), 4 مهر 2007 , صفحه 61-69
https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v17i56.694

  • مقاله
  • دانلود
  • ارجاع
  • آمار
  • اشتراک

چکیده

Abstract

Introduction: Sampling is an important phase in research, which directly influences on applicability and generalizability of findings. Therefore, it is critical in research process.

 

Purpose: The purpose of this review was to assess sampling methods in published articles at the first 3 issues of  the Journal of "Nursing Research" in 2004.

 

Materials and Methods: A checklist was first made by reviewing literature and all articles in the issues were chosen. A critical appraisal of literature review, methods, results and discussion of the articles was performed by the checklist. SPSS package was used for data analysis.

 

Results: Findings showed that samples in most studies were healthy people. Published articles explained about the target population, accessible population, the number of subjects and their features. However, a systematic bias was observed in all studied studies.

 

Conclusion: Most authors did not describe the sampling method of their studies completely. This may make the critical review of sampling design, duplication of study and future meta-analysis hard. In addition, sample representativeness, sampling errors and systematic bias cannot be thoroughly evaluated. In most articles, authors referred to limitations resulted from failure in sampling design, which may restrict generalization.

  

Keywords: Research Critique, Sampling.

  • PDF (English)

ارجاع به مقاله

Khatiban, M., Abed Saeed, J., & Ashtari, I. (2007). Sampling in quantitative research. Advances in Nursing & Midwifery, 17(56), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.22037/anm.v17i56.694
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acm-sig-proceedings##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.acs-nano##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.apa##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.associacao-brasileira-de-normas-tecnicas##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.chicago-author-date##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.harvard-cite-them-right##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.ieee##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.modern-language-association##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.turabian-fullnote-bibliography##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.style.vancouver##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.ris##
  • ##plugins.generic.citationStyleLanguage.download.bibtex##
  • چکیده مشاهده شده: 1418 بار
  • PDF (English) دانلود شده: 1276 بار

آمار دانلود

  • لینکدین
  • تویتر
  • فیسبوک
  • گوگل پلاس
  • تلگرام

اطلاعات

  • برای خوانندگان
  • برای نویسندگان
  • برای کتابداران

زبان

  • English
  • فارسی
  • صفحه اصلی
  • بایگانی
  • ارسال مقاله
  • درباره‌ی مجله
  • تیم سردبیری
  • اطلاعات تماس

Print ISSN: 2383-3750
Electronic ISSN: 2538-399X

قدرت یافته از OJSPlus